Blog


Compel TCPA defendants who don’t want to answer discovery requests

TCPA lawsuits often require propounding carefully written discovery requests that can’t be dodged with a useless answer or an objection that will stick, and then the second problem is compelling answers to the inevitable initial objections and non-answers. I have an earlier post on compelling discovery answers as well. We can learn a lot from…
LEARN MORE Compel TCPA defendants who don’t want to answer discovery requests

4 Telemarketers indicted for selling BS health insurance

The United States Attorney recently unsealed an indictment against four telemarketers who were busted for using the telephone to sell essentially fake or worthless health “insurance” policies. The situation is a look behind the curtain of how many telemarketers operate day in and day out. According to the Justice Department’s press release, Alan Redmond, Arthur…
LEARN MORE 4 Telemarketers indicted for selling BS health insurance

What is a FOUNDATIONAL 30(b)(6) deposition and why do you want one?

Previously I wrote about what is a 30(b)(6) deposition and why do you want one, and I noted in another article about a TCPA plaintiff getting the run around that a foundational 30(b)(6) deposition might be useful. But what is a foundational 30(b)(6) deposition? A foundational 30(b)(6) deposition is typically done at the outset of…
LEARN MORE What is a FOUNDATIONAL 30(b)(6) deposition and why do you want one?

Settlement strategies in TCPA lawsuits – Plaintiff’s perspective

Our good friend Mr. Troutman recently posted a blog article with his commentary on a TCPA settlement exemplified in Katz v. Allied First Bank, 2025 WL 1489176 (N.D. Ill May 24, 20245). In this lawsuit, Mr. Katz sued Allied First Bank, the seller, and Consumer Nsight, the telemarketer/lead seller. Consumer Nsight settled with Mr. Katz…
LEARN MORE Settlement strategies in TCPA lawsuits – Plaintiff’s perspective