Blog


Set the hook on 47 CFR § 64.1200(d) TCPA violations

One of the regulations implementing the Telephone Consumer Protection Act is 47 CFR § 64.1200(d): No person or entity shall initiate any artificial or prerecorded-voice telephone call pursuant to an exemption under paragraphs (a)(3)(ii) through (v) of this section or any call for telemarketing purposes to a residential telephone subscriber unless such person or entity…
LEARN MORE Set the hook on 47 CFR § 64.1200(d) TCPA violations

Be very wary of poorly worded requests for admissions or you’ll be like this defendant

In a past blog article I wrote about admissions vs stipulations, and the inherent weaknesses of admissions. Admissions in federal court have another weakness, they bind both parties. Let’s look at FRCP 36(b): Effect of an Admission; Withdrawing or Amending It. A matter admitted under this rule is conclusively established unless the court, on motion,…
LEARN MORE Be very wary of poorly worded requests for admissions or you’ll be like this defendant

Washington State’s Consumer Electronic Mail Act works on emails too

Earlier I wrote about Washington State’s Consumer Electronic Mail Act RCW 19.190‘s application to text messages, and I mentioned it works on emails also. What’s prohibited RCW 19.190.202(1): No person may initiate the transmission, conspire with another to initiate the transmission, or assist the transmission, of a commercial electronic mail message from a computer located…
LEARN MORE Washington State’s Consumer Electronic Mail Act works on emails too

Washington State’s Consumer Electronic Mail Act vs the Telephone Consumer Protection Act

The Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) is a federal statute regulating telephone solicitation and telephone call technology. Each state is free to enact its own telemarketing laws and Washington State has done so, including the Consumer Electronic Mail Act (CEMA) under Chapter 19.190 RCW. In terms of telemarketing (CEMA also regulates some emails) RCW 19.190…
LEARN MORE Washington State’s Consumer Electronic Mail Act vs the Telephone Consumer Protection Act

Are opt-in confirmation texts actionable under the TCPA? Federal judge says Maybe!

Today I want to talk about a defendant in a TCPA lawsuit that sent some confirmation text messages and is now going to trial for unwanted solicitations in violation of the telephone consumer protection act. The lawsuit and opinion is Abboud v. Circle K Stores Inc., No. CV-23-01683-PHX-DWL, 2 (D. Ariz. Jan. 27, 2025). There…
LEARN MORE Are opt-in confirmation texts actionable under the TCPA? Federal judge says Maybe!

A review of a pro-se plaintiff’s TCPA complaint against Alleviate Tax

This is an unsolicited review of pro-se plaintiff Farbod Moghadam’s second amended complaint against Alleviate Tax LLC alleging violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) in the New Jersey federal district court. First, I congratulate him for having the moxie to stand up against telemarketers. The Troutman law firm is defending Alleviate so he…
LEARN MORE A review of a pro-se plaintiff’s TCPA complaint against Alleviate Tax

Let’s review the worst dumb telemarketing counterclaim I’ve ever seen

The five folks reading this blog know I’m following the saga of Nathan Barton’s telemarketing lawsuits against Joe Delfgauw and friends. And how to beat frivolous counterclaims. Today is our lucky day because we get to do both. For those who don’t know, the underlying case is this one. Barton v. Delfgauw, 3:21-cv-05610-DGE, (W.D. Wash….
LEARN MORE Let’s review the worst dumb telemarketing counterclaim I’ve ever seen