Blog
BK attorney’s reaction to Dave Ramsey telling homeless, unemployed Ohio man with $14K debt there’s no point declaring bankruptcy.
Yahoo Finance just ran a story “Dave Ramsey tells homeless, unemployed Ohio man with $14K debt there’s no point declaring bankruptcy.” I just had to read it and give my reaction. A Mr. Toby gave Mr. Ramsey a call. Toby is homeless, unemployed and saddled with $14,000 in debt of which nearly half is a…
Yet ANOTHER court says text messages are phone calls under the TCPA
Now, if or when the are-text-messages-calls-under-the-tcpa hits the Supreme Court, all bets are off on how that political body will rule. But in the land of facts and reason, district courts are wrestling with the problem. The latest court is Mujahid v. Newity, LLC, No. 25 C 8012, 2025 LX 517816 (N.D. Ill. Nov. 10,…
A do it yourself guide on vacating a default judgment in Washington State
Have you been blind sided by a default judgment because you didn’t file an Answer? Maybe your wages are being garnished and it’s the first you’ve heard of the lawsuit. Sometimes debt collection lawsuits are for low enough amounts that it doesn’t make sense to hire an attorney to deal with them. This is a…
Federal judge grabs bull by the horns – orders TCPA defendant to explain fraud allegations
TCPA defendants love accusing TCPA plaintiffs of manufacturing the claim. Usually there is little downside to doing so, but one judge apparently decided to cut to the chase. The case is ZELMA v. RAM et al in the District of New Jersey, case #2:25-cv-15701-EP-JS. The defendants removed the case from state court, then wrote a…
Plaintiffs litigating TCPA cases in the Western District of WA – Judge just gave you a great opinion on striking improper affirmative defenses
If you are litigating a telephone consumer protection act, fair debt collection practices act, or fair credit reporting act lawsuit, you probably are no stranger to receiving 20-30 boiler plate affirmative defenses. Western District of Washington federal judge David G. Estudillo just handed you a great opinion on how to either get them struck, or…
Federal court discusses call-within-a-call artificial or prerecorded voice 47 U.S.C. § 227(b)(1)(A) claims
TCPA plaintiffs George Moore and Robert Hossfeld are back in the saddle doing god’s work – unraveling the complex relationship the big insurance companies have with telemarketers to benefit from illegal calls while hiding their responsibility in initiating them. The case is Moore v. Farmers Grp., Inc., No. 23-cv-16587, 2025 LX 420508 (N.D. Ill. Oct….
Telemarketer Joe Delfgauw owns up to the truth – he doesn’t think it is his responsibility to weed out fraudulent opt ins
This is another article looking at testimony telemarketer Joe Delfgauw gave where he explains how telemarketing works. Click here for the article on the role statistics play in deciding if an individual opt in is fraudulent or not. Click here for the article on how most unwanted telemarketing calls could be stopped for a single…
Show damages when building your FDCPA case Part 2
A few weeks ago I blogged about how debt collectors often violate the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act because courts don’t care if illegal collection practices cost you worry and wasted time if you can’t show “damages” they do care about. I gave a list of actions you might take to demonstrate the “concrete” damages…
Is that website arbitration provision enforceable?
I’ve posted several articles on the topic of avoiding arbitration when litigating over a fraudulent opt here and here. However not every solicitation is illegal. For example in many cases companies you do business with are exempted from solicitation call regulations for 3 or 18 months because of the business relationship, or until canceled by…
Don’t be the pro-se plaintiff constantly asking for sanctions
A theme I see with some pro-se plaintiffs is constantly asking for sanctions. Because sometimes I consult with them on their cases maybe I am more sensitive to it, but it drives me a little crazy when I see a pro-se see anything from a small mistake from the other side, to a strategic choice…
FCRA plaintiff fails to hold TransUnion accountable
The Fair Credit Reporting Act does not require that the furnishers of credit information and the credit reporting agencies themselves report anything, but it does require that the information they do report be accurate. To that end the FCRA allows consumers to dispute inaccurate information. But what duty do the credit reporting agencies have to…
Show damages when building your FDCPA case
The Fair Debt Collection Practices act is intended to prevent deceptive or abusive collection practices. In theory debt collectors who violate the FDCPA are subject to a $1,000 penalty to discourage dishonest debt collection practices. However the courts are generally anti-consumer and this case will demonstrate why a debt collector breaks the law in demanding…












